Jan
15
2011

The Call of Muhammad (p.b.u.h.)

Rainer Maria Rilke

Rainer Maria Rilke (1875-1926)

Europe holds some deep Islamic secrets embedded in its history, theology, culture and literature. But none is more amazing than the relationship between a famous 20th century German poet and Islam.

Rainer Maria Rilke (1875-1926) is considered one of the German language’s greatest poets. His haunting images focus on the difficulty of communion with the ineffable in an age of disbelief, solitude and profound anxiety – themes that tend to position him as a transitional figure between the traditions and the modernist posts.

Throughout his life Rilke showed a high opinion of Islam and especially the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. This is obvious in his letters and some of his key poems. Yet not much of this exciting relationship between a European poet and the Blessed Prophet is known or appreciated by the masses.

To understand the relationship one has to grasp the relationship between poetry and poets in traditional societies and especially within the Islamic tradition.

Tufayl ibn Amr was a noble man of virtue, leader of the distinguished tribe of Daws that resided in the southern part of the Arabian peninsula during the time of the Prophet Muhammad. Tufail fed the hungry, comforted those in distress and provided refuge to asylum seekers. He was also an outstanding poet capable of expressing subtle emotions in verse. Poetry was to the Arabs what pop songs are to our modern culture.

Tufayl’s conversion to Islam came while on a visit to Mecca. He was warned by the elite among Muhammad’s enemies in the powerful tribe of Quraysh to protect himself from the words of someone they described as an oracle. Tufayl plugged his ears with cotton even though he felt confident that he was capable of distinguishing between poetry and wizardry. Curiosity got the better of him though, and as he edged closer to the place where Muhammad was engrossed in prayers, bits and pieces of the Quran filtered past his ear plugs and stilled his troubled heart. He was convinced what he had heard could not be the speech of man.

Tufayl removed the cotton from his ears and followed the Arabian Prophet home. There, he asked him to recite more of what he had overheard. The Prophet recited two short chapters of the Quran and Tufayl submitted to his message and pledged his allegiance to the Prophet.

He returned to his people and shared what he had learned. In so doing he opened the doors of Islam to Abu Hurayah, the inimitable companion of Muhammad who went on to narrate thousands of ‘hadith’ (sayings of the Prophet) that are quoted to this day by Muslims all over the world, exactly as he documented them.

Poets are remarkable people. They are the pulse – or curse – of a civilized society. Poets can take ordinary experience and express them in ways that can benefit others.  They provide hope when all that seems to exist is despair. Poets can also steer people away from reality into a world of myth and distortion. The dual role of poetry is reflected in chapter 26 of Quran which is titled “The Poets.”

Although Prophet Muhammad was the recipient of the verses of the Quran which Muslims believe were preserved in his heart, he nevertheless admired good poetry. There was no comparison however, between the revealed verses of the Quran and the rhyme of the poet. The Quran says:

“And God did not teach him (Muhammad) poetry, nor is it befitting of him.”

Even so, Muhammad recognized the beauty in poetry and never failed to praise it. Labid, one of the seven superior poets whose verse were hung inside the Ka’ba in pre-Islamic Arabian Peninsula, once coined a verse that read: “Verily, Everything except God is futile.” When the Prophet heard the verse he said:  ‘the truest words ever spoken by a poet are the words of Labid.’

Muhammad honored the poets among his followers and on several occasions he urged them to keep on reciting verses when they may have felt they had gone on far too long in his presence. Hasan ibn Thabit, the Prophet’s appointed poet, would often recite his poetry in the sacred mosque of the Prophet in the city of Medina. Muhammad once prayed that God support him with the same “Holy Spirit” that came to him with revelations.

There were others as well. Ka’b ibn Malik, Abdallah ibn Rawaha and Ka’b ibn Zuhair were all celebrated poets who lived in the city of the Prophet and who practiced their art in the open. It is reported that on one occasion Zuhair had slandered the Prophet. This means that at the time he could not have been a believer. Feeling a deep sense of regret for what he had done, he recited a lengthy poem in the presence of Muhammad. So impressed was the latter by his eloquent apology, that he took off his mantle (Burda) and covered Zuhair, evidence that he had been forgiven.

Everywhere in the Muslim world, from that time onwards, the Mantle (Burda) became a symbol of Prophetic sanction, blessings, and healing. Moreover, it encouraged anyone who desired to indulge in praise of the Prophet, to do so in whatever language they wished.

From the numerous islands in the Pacific Ocean to the tiny tropical dreamscapes of the Caribbean, Muslims and people from other faith traditions sing the praises of Muhammad. In Tamil and English, in Urdu and Dari, Spanish and French, even Chinese and Russian, Muhammad’s call echoes across the globe in a kaleidoscope of cultures and languages, song and music.

Rainer Maria Rilke, one of the greatest poets of the 20th century, also responded to the ‘Call of Muhammad.’ And yet there is no evidence that he had ever converted to Islam.

Anyone who is unaware of Rilke’s influence on contemporary literary fiction, music, art and film, needs a primer on the foundations of modern popular culture. The brilliant philosopher Martin Heidegger cites Rilke as the highest form of thinker in his poem “What are Poets For?” Today, his ideas and words are inscribed in the books of J.D. Salinger, Douglas Coupland and Amitav Ghosh.

Rilke’s poem “You who never arrived” pops up in Norman Jewison 1994 film “Only You” starring Marisa Tomei. His famous quote, “For one human being to love another: that is perhaps the most difficult of all our tasks, the work for which all other work is but preparation,” is cited before the credits in the award-winning 2006 film ‘Loving Annabelle.’

In his early works such as the semi-autobiographical ‘Notes of Malte Laurids Brigge,’ Rilke was searching for answers to the important questions of his time. Faced with a deep sense of alienation and loneliness he wanted to know the true meaning of human existence.

When his wife Clara returned from a visit to Eygpt in 1907 she showed him her sketches and the entries in her diary. Rilke was impressed with what he saw and heard. The picture that Clara painted of the people told Rilke that while they might be regarded as impoverished, they nevertheless radiated an inner sense of contentment and happiness.

Rilke believed that the purpose of life had to be much more than the acquisition of material wealth. In 1907 he turned to the Quran and began a serious study of the book that Muslims believe is guidance to all of mankind.

Rilke was fascinated by what he was reading. He wrote:

“And once I tried to learn the Quran by heart. I didn’t get very far, but what I did understand was that there you see a mighty index finger, pointing towards God, grasped in His eternal rise, in an Orient that will never be exhausted.”

Rilke also read available biographies of the Prophet Muhammad and concluded that the solution to the deep social and psychological alienation that had taken a firm hold in his culture was to submit to God’s will, like the followers of Muhammad in the East.

In 1907 he penned a beautiful poem entitled: “Mohammed’s Berufung” meaning ‘Mohammed’s Call.’ What follows is a translation of the poem by  Leonard Cottrell in 2001.

“Power stepped into his hiding place:

at once a presence he could not mistake

He begged the Angel – upright, fair and ablaze –
to leave him as he was.

He would forsake all his ambitions;

it was best he stayed that baffled,

over-traveled man of trade.

He’d never learned his letters, and now such a word!

For wise men, even, far too much.

But no, the Angel fiercely showed and showed

the writing on its leaf.

This will that glowed would not back down,

again demanding – Read.

And then he did.

The Angel bowed its head before him,

one from thenceforth who had Read,

who knew, obeyed, and carried out the decrees.

In ‘Mohammed’s Call,’ Rilke refers to the Angel Gabriel as ‘Power’ who entered the cave on the mountain of Hira, outside Mecca — Muhammad’s place of retreat where he frequently sought refuge from the paganism of Meccan society.  It was in this cave that Muslims believe revelation first came to him at the age of 40.

It was not possible for the Prophet to mistake the presence of the Angel, wrote Rilke, and he was palpably afraid and begged to be left alone – to be that ‘baffled over-traveled’ trader — Muhammad’s occupation prior to revelation. Muhammad was not able to neither read nor write, and so when the Angel demanded that he Read, Rilke said ‘it was far too much.’ But once he did, the Angel bowed in deference to him.

To be able to write these words in 1907 in a language other than Arabic makes it abundantly clear that Rilke must have read more than the equivalent of a copy of ‘Islam for Dummies.’

In 1910 Rilke finally embarked on a journey of his own to Algeria. He was moved by the way people went about their daily lives and how the five daily prayers of Muslims was fused seamlessly into whatever they did to earn a living. In a letter to his wife he observed that “it is as if the Prophet had been there only yesterday, and the city is his very realm.” Rilke believed that the Muslim east was an ‘infinitely superior and wise reality.’

Two years later, in 1912, Rilke spent time in Spain and there he began a fresh study of the Quran. At some point after that he observed that “Christianity is constantly slicing God up like some beautiful cake, but Allah is One, Allah is Whole.”

The Muslim idea of Oneness or the Unity of purpose in all of God’s Creation, is something that had a profound impact on Rilke. The Quran, the life of Prophet Muhammad and the simplicity he saw reflected in the lives of Muhammad’s followers, resolved for Rilke what he saw as the major challenge emerging in European society.

In the last decade of his life, Rilke wrote his masterpiece Duino Elegies, a set of ten elegies. It is recorded that he got his inspiration at the edge of some cliffs where he heard a voice calling to him: “Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?” Which means; “If I cried out, who would hear me up there, among the angelic orders?”

In the mournful poems, modern man is depicted as lost in an alien environment. In them Rilke presents an alternative where man, animals and plants are unified in their original purpose and where life and death are juxtaposed to each other – a place where people have no fear of death because they are no longer selfish. For Rilke, life and death are but two realities that point to a single Reality. God.

By Nazim Baksh,
a broadcast correspondent with CBC. Based in Toronto, Canada,
he is also a Canadian Journalism Fellow at Massey College, University of Toronto.

11 Comments + Add Comment

  • I think this is among the most important info for me. And i am glad reading your article. But should remark on some general things, The site style is great, the articles is really great : D. Good job, cheers

    • I am a lawyer pricticang in d high court chennai India. I am d founder of Roshni an NGO which works with with marginalized women n girl children. I am so inspired to hear that Muslim men r taking up d cause of domestic violence against Muslim women which is very often not brought to public notice but swept away under d carpet. Roshni with other orgis planning a human chain to protest against this violence on nov 25 which is domestic violence day.I would b grateful for ur support in any form.pls continue ur invaluable support to the Muslim women.Bader Sayeed

  • wonderful site.. i really enjoyed reading your article.

  • Youre so right. Im there with you. Your blog is surely worth a read if anyone comes throughout it. Im lucky I did because now Ive acquired a whole new view of Islam. I didnt realise that this issue was so important and so universal. You absolutely put it in perspective for me.

    • This is a Muslim-bashing at its worst. Lies, half-truths and distortions do not hriotsy or truth make. While there are some truths mentioned, most were half-baked, twisted or distorted and without the full story. Other despicable acts mentioned are the work of evil humans who call themselves Muslim, but hardly act as Islam teaches. This is just like the Christian Crusaders, who boiled, roasted and ate babies (documented facts) on the First Crusade, the Spanish Inquisitors who tortured, maimed and killed in the name of Jesus, or Adolf Hitler and his cohorts, ostensibly Christians all, who perpetrated the most heinous crimes against humanity in recorded hriotsy. None of these acts had anything to do with what Christianity teaches either. So, why identify an entire religion with what a few of its so-called adherents did? Interestingly enough, Muslims wouldn’t dream of condemning Christianity for the acts of the Crusaders, Inquisitors, or Hitler, or anyone else. They believe that it’s the individuals who are at fault, not the religion. That’s how they see it. So, why can’t we? If Muslims or Christians, or those from other faith traditions were to follow the teachings of their faith so similar among all the world’s major faiths world over the world would be a much better place. Otherwise, what the author has done here is rehash old stories that have been disproved before and added one or two new ones (with one-sided explanations). This is a book for people who want to believe the worst about Islam and Muslims. As such, it is hardly historical, or factual. I’ve always found it interesting to see Christians so eager to attack Islam, while Muslims never attack Christianity in response. Perhaps that’s because they’ve been told in the Qur’an not to do so, nor to argue with Christians (except kindly) and consider them closest in faith to themselves. Some Christians, like the author of this work (if he is a Christian), all too often show Christianity at its worst. This is a trait too many Christians have shown, on behalf of Christianity, against all who disagreed with it since it became the religion of the Roman Empire at the end of the fourth century. This is not to say Muslims haven’t done bad things, or been bad people, far from it. But it does say that just as those Christians mentioned earlier who didn’t follow their faith and its teachings, so some Muslims not acting as Islam taught have done horrific things, too. As such, they are not considered Muslims like those who flew the hijacked planes into the Twin Towers. Knowledgeable Muslims believe they’ve gone to hell in a handcart as false martyrs. Whether or not they were actually practicing Muslims, or just using the religion as a cover for their heinous crimes as so many have done since time immemorial, will be left up to a higher authority than us to judge. In conclusion, the publication of this book was a sad day for tolerance and understanding and, otherwise contributed nothing positive or good but only added immeasurably to ignorance about Muslims and Islam. Today, we are at war, but it’s a war led by morally bankrupt and un-Christ-like neoconservative fundamentalist Christians against Islam. And this book has joined in the fray.Michael D. Berdine, Ph.D

  • Hello. Great job. I did not expect this. This is a great story. Thanks!

    • Since there were believers and non-believers, the lteatr did all they could to attack the true religion of God and to make the believers abandon their faith. It happened with Jews as the believers (muslims) at the time of Moses PBUH (Peace Be Upon Him), when the pharaoh told all the lies about Moses, his religion and his followers. The same happened with Christians as the believers (muslims) at the time of Jesus PBUH. The Romans did whith Christians what the pharaohs did to the Jews. Now, the same is happening with Islam, the only religion with true monotheism that addresses God as being perfect, and invite people to worship Him ONLY!So, the hatred and lies in Trifkovic book are expected. It’s not the first book of its kind, and it will not be the last.If you want to learn about Buddhism, for example, do you read books by those who hate Buddhism?! So, for those who are sincere in seeking the truth, I encourage them to learn about Islam from Islamic literature! The books and videos of Harun Yahya may be a good start. For those who’re not seeking the truth, they will remember these words in the hereafter.

  • Top-notch news it is surely. My boss has been seeking for this info

    • Wow! Great tihkning! JK

  • I have been reading out many of your articles and i can state pretty good stuff. I will surely bookmark your site.

  • Nice design I think.

Leave a comment

*